# Request For Proposals: RFP #1 (RETRACTED)

**URL:** <https://horizen.discourse.group/t/request-for-proposals-rfp-1-retracted/575>\
**Category:** Proposal Discussions\
**Created:** [April 22, 2024, 6:50pm UTC](https://horizen.discourse.group/t/request-for-proposals-rfp-1-retracted/575 "2024-04-22T18:50:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![blockops](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/horizen.discourse.group/blockops/32/523_2.png) [@blockops](https://horizen.discourse.group/u/blockops)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2024, 2:21pm UTC](https://horizen.discourse.group/t/request-for-proposals-rfp-1-retracted/575/6 "2024-04-24T14:21:44Z")

</div>

I would like to see that the tokenomics proposal include an incentivized testnet. See this topic here for details:

> [@Incentivized testnet for Proof Verification chain](https://horizen.discourse.group/t/incentivized-testnet-for-proof-verification-chain/581):
>
> If a zenIP passes for a new token for the proof verification chain, there will be need for testing and integration. We should definitely have a multiple phase incentivized testnet! This may need to be part of a tokenomics study, or perhaps we can do a zenip just for a token carve-out to authorize incentivized testnet. Maybe having an incentivized testnet needs a zenip of its own. If so, this can be the discussion for it. We can use it to generate partnership participation, hosted validator s…

---

_[View the full topic](https://horizen.discourse.group/t/request-for-proposals-rfp-1-retracted/575)._
